Flickr vs Picasa – Picasa vs Flickr
- Monday, September 7, 2009, 4:44
- 7 comments
Flickr vs Picasa or Picasa vs Flickr web albums is the one you have to know or use if your cell phone and digital camera are loaded with tons of photographs that you have captured when you went to a long trip or drive.You will probably like to upload it somewhere and share those memorable pictures with your friends and family
The two most popular photo sharing services are Yahoo’s Flickr and Picasa Web Albums, which is owned by Google. We’ll dig deeper into each of the services to help you choose the right one for your job.
Picasa Web Albums service, which is Google’s answer to Yahoo Flickr, has gone live today. Like other Google beta services, Picasa Web is open by invitation only.
We had a chance to try Picasa Web Albums and our first impression is that it is very inspired by Flickr but not anywhere near. Here’s a first hand comparison of Picasa Web Albums with Flickr based on several parameters like prices, storage, ease of use, features, etc.
Flickr :
Flickr is a well known in the photo sharing market and is owned by Yahoo. It has a good interface, it’s polished, works well, and is indeed addictive. But Flickr has some limitations Flickr offers 100 MB of free storage each calendar month but the storage counter is reset every month so you get virtually unlimited space on Flickr without spending a penny. (100 MB is good for storing upto 120 picture of average size). New pictures can be uploaded to Flickr via mobile phones, desktop software, email attachments or through the web-based interface available on Flickr website. Pictures can then be grouped in sets (like “Conference in New York”) as well as tags (like “conference”). You can upgrade to Pro for making the number of photos unlimited for each month but even after you upgrade to Pro, you’ll bump up against more limitations if your JPG files are over 10MB each, which happens quite often when you shoot with a late-model DSLR and upload at full resolution with the intention of printing that photo in a large size. Use Flickr if you want to engage actively within the big and friendly Flickr user community, get comments on your photos, join groups and submit photos to them — in short, partake fully of the social community of photo sharing.
Picasa Web Albums :
This is the photo sharing client owned by Web Giant Google, This was made to enable Google Image Organization Software Picasa user’s to share there photos online. One can create private and public albums there and order prints. This is the best option for Photo sharing for a regular person but the storage is limited(Disadvantage over Flickr) it has a 1 GB storage and then Paid storage of 7Gb for $25 a year, You can come over this just by resizing the images rather than uploading the full High Resolution Pics. The default option is to resize only, so that’ll get done automatically. Once you’ve done tell your friends and its done.
Extra Features :
For describing the photo, both services let you edit tags and a caption for the image, with Flickr also letting you give each photo a title. Both have a mapping feature letting you set a location for the photo on an interactive map. For the technical data relating to the photo, both services will read and display the EXIF data from a digital camera such as shutter speed, date/time etc. And for viewing a bunch of images, both have a slideshow feature built in. Finally, both services let you specify a name to make a more user friendly URL to give to your friends or family.
Flickr Vs Picasa :
Transferring Photos: In Flickr the picture upload thing is very easy but downloading photos from there is difficult, for this you may need to have a 3rd part Flickr App where as in Google’s Picasa Web Albums it comes with an application Picasa. Through Picasa, you can do basic image editing (like crop, rotate, color adjustments, etc) and then upload the edited pictures online. The software can also download photos from the online Picasa albums to your hard-drive without any effort.
Organization: Picasa lets you create as many “albums” as you like to sort your photos into. Flickr lets you have just 3 “sets” to group your photos in, otherwise they all get added to a single “photostream”. For unlimited sets at Flickr you’ll have to go pro.
Storage: Picasa gives you 1GB of storage with the option to buy more (7GB for US$25 per year – shared storage with your Gmail account). Flickr doesn’t state a storage limit, instead they have an upload limit of 100MB per month and limit your “photostream” to the 200 most recent images. The “pro” option at Flickr which will give you unlimited uploads, storage, bandwidth and more.
Cost: Both Flickr and Picasa offer a free service initially, but with limitations on the service at Flickr And a word of warning here, Flickr’s FAQ states “if your free account is inactive for 90 consecutive days, it will be deleted”. Picasa is better here. You can upgrade to Flickr Pro for $25 and upgarde you 1GB to 7GB in Picasa for $25 a year.
Photo Uploading :
Both services provide a web browser interface for uploading pictures. When it comes to software, Flickr has a very basic Flickr Uploader software while Google has integrated the photo uploader right in the Picasa software itself. However, Flickr provides other photo uploading options like Mobile Phones and email.
Conclusion : Take the Flickr route. I would probably use Picasa Web Albums for storing picture backups but Flickr remains my favorite service until Google introduces tags, communities and more photo uploading options.

About the Author
7 Comments on “Flickr vs Picasa – Picasa vs Flickr”
Write a Comment
Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!


I have a flikr account and a picasa account. I ust the flickr for my business because I like the tags it allows. I use picasa for my family pictures because it is easier to share with my family. (Most of them have gmail.)
I’m pretty sure you don’t have unlimited space for free on Flickr — you can upload as many photos as you want, but you (or anyone else) can only see the last 200 of them.
“In Flickr the picture upload thing is very easy but downloading photos from there is difficult, for this you may need to have a 3rd part Flickr App where as in Google’s Picasa Web Albums it comes with an application Picasa. ”
Downloading from Flickr is easy. Just click on the “all sizes” and drag down the version you want. Third party sharewares make batch downloading easy. Picasa for OSX never worked reliably for me, always waited and waited and got half the download. Flickr is a joy to use. Picasa made me want to shoot myself.
Surely if I get any of these 2 (I’m leaning to Picasa because family pictures/vacations etc… only) I don’t have to use gmail or yahoo et.c.. I can still name & upload pics from my picures or whatever – yes ?
I had Adobe previously and hated it – I mostly want to still use my docs to upload pics to friends in e-mail and occasionally straight from program (or allow them to get online and view my Picasa program & pics….)
With Adobe I wasn’t able to name my picures in my docs and when I want to send one via my own e-mail account (not gmail or anything like that) I couldn’t find it because it was just folders and files with dates still …
I just want an easy program that will allow me to edit, store & name my pics in group albums (more than 1 possibly, as has been said) as well as have the pcis on my hard dirve for backing up.
Flickr & Picasa are good and I use both, however, SimpleViewer allows you to post your Google ads without hassle or fear of having your account deleted (flickr):
http://www.varsityphotos.net/ag/ag_main.htm
http://www.varsityphotos.net/michele/mchele_main.htm
htttp’//www.photoscool..net htttp;//wwphotoscool.net
flickr and google r ok to post haveing comment andpicasa and good comment